Thursday, November 28, 2019

Analyzing the use of Databases in an Organization

Analyzing the use of Databases in an Organization According to the American Heritage New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy Third Edition, (n.d.) a "database consists of a set of data grouped together in one location in (or accessible by) a computer". A database stores keyed information in an organized and accessible manner. The size and capacity of databases can vary from a small database used by an individual to personal information, to an extremely large enterprise database that stores several gigabytes of information accessed by thousands of individuals within an organization. Databases are essential for almost every company in today's business world. Databases can help us to keep track of many things such as personnel, inventory, phone numbers, and important trainings and updates.Microsoft AccessMicrosoft Access for Windows is a relational database management system. Microsoft Access uses the graphical abilities of Windows so that one can easily view and work with his or her data in a convenient manner.database schemaMicrosoft Acc ess makes one data available to one quickly and easily, and presents it in an effective and readable way. Its ability to locate information using query by example eliminates keystrokes and consequently speeds up the development process of what an individual is trying to accomplish.Microsoft Access lets an individual examine his or her data in a variety of ways. Sometimes the information in a record is easier to understand if the fields are arranged on a form or a report in a visually pleasing way; sometimes an individual's need to see the maximum number of data records possible on his or her screen so he or she can have an idea of what he or she is working with. A Microsoft Access form is a special window that is used for data entry. One can use the visual capabilities of Windows to create a custom form using...

Sunday, November 24, 2019

Red Barons Kills

Red Barons Kills Flying ace Manfred von Richthofen, more commonly known as the  Red Baron,  was not only one of the best pilots of World War I:  he has become an icon of the war itself. Credited with shooting down 80 enemy aircraft, the Red Baron owned the skies. His bright red airplane (a very unusual and ostentatious color for a fighting plane) brought both respect and fear. To the Germans, Richthofen was known as the Red Battle Flier and his exploits brought the German people courage as well as increased morale during the bloody years of the war. Although the Red Baron survived for much longer than most fighter pilots during World War I, he eventually met their same fate. On April 21, 1918, the day after his 80th kill, the Red Baron once again got into his red airplane and went searching for the enemy. Unfortunately, this time, it was the Red Baron who was shot down. Below is a list of the Red Barons kills. Some of these aircraft  held one and others held two people. Not all of the crew members were killed when their airplanes crashed. No. Date Type of Aircraft Location 1 Sept. 17, 1916 FE 2b near Cambrai 2 Sept. 23, 1916 Martinsyde G 100 Somme River 3 Sept. 30, 1916 FE 2b Fremicourt 4 Oct. 7, 1916 BE 12 Equancourt 5 Oct. 10, 1916 BE 12 Ypres 6 Oct. 16, 1916 BE 12 near Ypres 7 Nov. 3, 1916 FE 2b Loupart Wood 8 Nov. 9, 1916 Be 2c Beugny 9 Nov. 20, 1916 BE 12 Geudecourt 10 Nov. 20, 1916 FE 2b Geudecourt 11 Nov. 23, 1916 DH 2 Bapaume 12 Dec. 11, 1916 DH 2 Mercatel 13 Dec. 20, 1916 DH 2 Moncy-le-Preux 14 Dec. 20, 1916 FE 2b Moreuil 15 Dec. 27, 1916 FE 2b Ficheux 16 Jan. 4, 1917 Sopwith Pup Metz-en-Coutre 17 Jan. 23, 1917 FE 8 Lens 18 Jan. 24, 1917 FE 2b Vitry 19 Feb. 1, 1917 BE 2e Thelus 20 Feb. 14, 1917 BE 2d Loos 21 Feb. 14, 1917 BE 2d Mazingarbe 22 Mar. 4, 1917 Sopwith 1 1/2 Strutter Acheville 23 Mar. 4, 1917 BE 2d Loos 24 Mar. 3, 1917 BE 2c Souchez 25 Mar. 9, 1917 DH 2 Bailleul 26 Mar. 11, 1917 BE 2d Vimy 27 Mar. 17, 1917 FE 2b Oppy 28 Mar. 17, 1917 BE 2c Vimy 29 Mar. 21, 1917 BE 2c La Neuville 30 Mar. 24, 1917 Spad VII Givenchy 31 Mar. 25, 1917 Nieuport 17 Tilloy 32 April 2, 1917 BE 2d Farbus 33 April 2, 1917 Sopwith 1 1/2 Strutter Givenchy 34 April 3, 1917 FE 2d Lens 35 April 5, 1917 Bristol Fighter F 2a Lembras 36 April 5, 1917 Bristol Fighter F 2a Quincy 37 April 7, 1917 Nieuport 17 Mercatel 38 April 8, 1917 Sopwith 1 1/2 Strutter Farbus 39 April 8, 1917 BE 2e Vimy 40 April 11, 1917 BE 2c Willerval 41 April 13, 1917 RE 8 Vitry 42 April 13, 1917 FE 2b Monchy 43 April 13, 1917 FE 2b Henin 44 April 14, 1917 Nieuport 17 Bois Bernard 45 April 16, 1917 BE 2c Bailleul 46 April 22, 1917 FE 2b Lagnicourt 47 April 23, 1917 BE 2e Mericourt 48 April 28, 1917 BE 2e Pelves 49 April 29, 1917 Spad VII Lecluse 50 April 29, 1917 FE 2b Inchy 51 April 29, 1917 BE 2d Roeux 52 April 29, 1917 Nieuport 17 Billy-Montigny 53 June 18, 1917 RE 8 Strugwe 54 June 23, 1917 Spad VII Ypres 55 June 26, 1917 RE 8 Keilbergmelen 56 June 25, 1917 RE 8 Le Bizet 57 July 2, 1917 RE 8 Deulemont 58 Aug. 16, 1917 Nieuport 17 Houthulster Wald 59 Aug. 26, 1917 Spad VII Poelcapelle 60 Sept. 2, 1917 RE 8 Zonebeke 61 Sept. 3, 1917 Sopwith Pup Bousbecque 62 Nov. 23, 1917 DH 5 Bourlon Wood 63 Nov. 30, 1917 SE 5a Moevres 64 Mar. 12, 1918 Bristol Fighter F 2b Nauroy 65 Mar. 13, 1918 Sopwith Camel Gonnelieu 66 Mar. 18, 1918 Sopwith Camel Andigny 67 Mar. 24, 1918 SE 5a Combles 68 Mar. 25, 1918 Sopwith Camel Contalmaison 69 Mar. 26, 1918 Sopwith Camel Contalmaison 70 Mar. 26, 1918 RE 8 Albert 71 Mar. 27, 1918 Sopwith Camel Aveluy 72 Mar. 27, 1918 Bristol Fighter F 2b Foucacourt 73 Mar. 27, 1918 Bristol Fighter F 2b Chuignolles 74 Mar. 28, 1918 Armstrong Whitworth FK 8 Mericourt 75 April 2, 1918 FE 8 Moreuil 76 April 6, 1918 Sopwith Camel Villers-Bretonneux 77 April 7, 1918 SE 5a Hangard 78 April 7, 1918 Spad VII Villers-Bretonneux 79 April 20, 1918 Sopwith Camel Bois-de-Hamel 80 April 20, 1918 Sopwith Camel Villers-Bretonneux

Thursday, November 21, 2019

Organizational behavior and analysis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Organizational behavior and analysis - Essay Example In this paper, the researcher will shed light on various facets of personality and also discuss viability of personality testing as selection tool in the organization. But, the paper will be incomplete without the discussion of different personality theories hence in the next section, the researcher will shed light on different personality theories. Personality Theories- Backbone of Personality Testing Ellis, Abrams and Abrams (2008) defined personality as the set variety of schemas such as belief, attitude, personal trait, mindscape, social cognition etc. Important thing to remember is that, organizations conduct personality testing on the basis of standard parameters set for all the natural human being hence there are chances that the personality testing might fail to identify all the skill areas of the future employee. However, Lee (2004) pointed out that although employers expect to test the trustworthiness of the employee during personality testing but in very few cases, these e mployers become successful to judge social cognition of the recruit through personality testing. ... According to Yolles (2007 and 2008), people show the tendency to orient their personality trait in any one of the two knowledge types such as identification and elaboration. Perceived reality of people is formulated by sensing the external environment through 5 organs but sensate reality is developed when people are forced to go through certain process. Maruyama (2002) also found that personality of people is developed through perceived reality and not by sensate reality. In such context, employees can have following personality traits. Knowledge Type Characteristics Enantypes Identifiers Those employees who are able to accommodate the knowledge and translate the knowledge into actions. These employees tend to show knowledge competency during personality testing. Sensatist These employees show the tendency to develop existing idea but fail to show creativity during personality test. Ideationalist These employees are good at visualizing new solution but lacks in knowledge competency t o formulate the knowhow. Elaborators These employees show the personality trait of acquiring knowledge and also planning the course of action. Dramatist These employees have narrative thinking structure and show high level of interpersonal skills during work. Patterner These employees show the persistent curiosity towards external world and they are also good at problem solving. [Note: Actual theory was created by Yolles (2008) in context to human personality and in this paper; the researcher has used the model for personality of employees which are subjected to personality testing] Mindscape Theory Mindscape theory is probably the most recent development in the field of personality literature. Hentschel and